You can approach blended learning at different levels. You can start small, or you can completely (re)design your course.
Alammary and colleagues (2014) formulated three different levels for designing blended learning. The levels describe the impact of a blended learning (re)design on you as a lecturer.
In the low-impact blend, you add a number of additional activities to your current course design, for example, an online discussion forum or a walk-in Q&A session. The risk of this may be that the mutual components of your course design are not well aligned and, as a result, the new activities do not align well with the intended learning objectives and/or assessment. On the other hand, it can lead to a richer learning experience for the students, without a whole lot of effort for you as a lecturer.
Suitable for lecturers with relatively little teaching experience.
Tips:
+ It takes little time for you as a lecturer.
+ It can quickly lead to positive learning effects.
– Coherence between activities may decrease.
– Coherence between learning objectives, learning activities and assessment may decrease (constructive alignment).
In the medium-impact blend, you replace some activities in your current course design with new activities, for example replacing a traditional on-site lecture with a knowledge clip for students to watch prior to class so that there is more time for interaction during class.
Suitable for lecturers who already have some experience in teaching design but do not yet want to change their entire educational design.
Tips:
+ It is fairly easy to start with.
+ It is a way to change your teaching gradually.
+ It offers a lot of room for experimentation.
– It takes more time and effort than the low-impact blend.
– There are no ready-made solutions, so you have to dare to fail sometimes.
In the high-impact blend, you will completely (re)design your current course, for example by using the flipped classroom model throughout your course. During the redesign, you will consider which teaching activities best support the intended learning outcomes and how you will design those teaching activities. This will ensure good alignment between the intended learning outcomes, teaching activities and assessment (constructive alignment).
Suitable for lecturers who have extensive experience in teaching design and relatively high levels of educational and technological knowledge.
Tips:
+ It can enrich your teaching and solve potential problems.
+ It leads to good consistency between your intended learning outcomes, teaching activities and assessment (constructive alignment).
+ The student perspective is central, making you more responsive to their needs.
– It takes as much time as designing an entirely new course.
– You need a lot of educational and technological knowledge.
– There is a higher risk of failure.
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.693
Last, B. (2022). Blended learning in de praktijk. Modellen, strategieën, voorbeelden en andere handvatten. Boom.