Positionality statements are increasingly common in the context of inclusive teaching. This is where you, as a lecturer or course coordinator, reflect on how certain choices you have made in the syllabus are linked to your own socio-cultural and disciplinary perspectives. You can draft a positionality statement and publish it in your course handbook or on Canvas, or discuss it with your students during the first session.
Whether you choose to share a statement at all, and how much you reveal in it, is of course entirely up to you. But what is positionality, and what questions are important when reflecting on your teaching design? What sort of topics belong in a positionality statement?
A lecturer’s positionality refers to their specific worldview – such as personal beliefs, socio-economic status, cultural background and disciplinary practices – which may influence the choices made in the syllabus. In academia, the importance of self-reflection by the researcher is already more widely recognised, but teaching also benefits from transparency regarding the relevant perspectives that have guided course design. This is because all sorts of power dynamics – both explicit and implicit – can come into play when choosing the subject, defining learning objectives, selecting reading material, and determining teaching methods and assessment techniques. A positionality statement allows you to be transparent about this: it encourages openness and mutual communication, thereby increasing inclusion in your teaching.
We are often unaware of the prejudices we carry with us: everyone has them, and it is impossible to go through life completely free of prejudice. However, it is important to reflect on the kinds of prejudices that negatively affect your duties and responsibilities as a teacher.
Diversifying your syllabus begins with careful reflection on your attitude as a teacher and on the so-called ‘hidden curriculum’: this is a set of conventions that are taught without any explicit intention (Martin, 1983) – unofficial and unwritten rules that, alongside the official curriculum, help determine what students learn.
Even without an explicit statement, self-reflection is still recommended when designing your course: “Reflecting on your positionality as an instructor can be a powerful strategy for student success, especially if you think about how your lived experiences shape what you do in the classroom and how those actions may or may not be supporting the success of students in your class who often have very different lived experiences” (Harrington, 2020). Effective self-reflection during your course design can therefore lead to greater academic achievement for your students!
It is becoming increasingly common for lecturers to explain their choices and approach in the course syllabus using a social identity wheel exercise. You may also choose to discuss this during the first seminar.

