The aforementioned problems can largely be traced to our view of feedback. Often feedback is seen as the responsibility of the teacher: who formulates comments with high-level information that the student receives, as a kind of “gift”. This view of feedback emphasizes the passive role of the student; receiving a gift does not necessarily mean unwrapping it or doing something with it. Does this view sufficiently encourage the student to actively process the information received?
Current views of feedback focus on “sense-making,” or meaning-making, and the application of feedback by students. Feedback should stimulate thinking, and should set the receiver, not the giver, to work. One speaks of a partnership between student and teacher, in which the student learns to actively and critically solicit, give, receive and process feedback.
At the heart of this vision is feedback literacy: the knowledge, skills and attitudes that allow students to become active partners in the feedback process. This term attempts to emphasize that the feedback process is complex and that students must actively learn, be supported and encouraged in its use, just as they are with academic writing.