Use the checklist below to evaluate your course assessment on unauthorised use of GenAI. At the bottom of this page, you will find 5 tips on how to prevent unauthorised GenAI use.
The questions in the checklist can be answered with a V or an X. Each X indicates a potential risk of unauthorised GenAI use. The greatest risks are in unsupervised assignments. For instance, written assignments, but also presentations, podcasts and videos.
The UvA is currently developing a programme on AI in education. Therefore, this checklist will be updated every 6 months.
| No credits (EC) are awarded based on grades for assignments that students complete without supervision.
There is very little risk that students may pass the course through unauthorized use of GenAI; there is no need to answer the other questions.
|
|
| Yes, the final grade is determined by one or more assignments that students complete without supervision.
Continue with the other questions.
|
| The final grade is primarily determined by other forms of assessment. For instance: an on-site examination, a practical test or an oral examination.
|
|
|
The final grade is determined (almost) exclusively by unsupervised assignments. |
|
During the course, the progress of students is monitored. For instance: students hand in drafts for (peer) feedback, they discuss their approach with the teacher, they complete part of the work on campus (in a tutorial), or they submit an (oral) report of the work process.
|
|
|
The entire or a large part of the work process occurs beyond the teacher’s supervision. |
|
The assignments require a course-specific level of depth and rely less on publicly available knowledge. The assignments are specifically tailored in content, format and/or method to what has been learned in the course and during classes.
|
|
| Students can make their own choices regarding content (theme), form and/or method, using publicly available knowledge.
|
|
The output is of little or no use, or would not lead to a pass in its current form. The student would need to refine the prompts significantly and use additional course-specific knowledge and/or skills.
|
|
| The output would lead to a passing result with no changes, or it could lead to a passing result with minimal changes or refined prompts.
|
| Students know whether/how they can responsibly use GenAI in the course. The teacher explicitly discusses the implications of GenAI use in assignments.
|
|
|
It is not clearly described how students can use GenAI, or the use is explicitly prohibited (although this cannot be easily enforced).
|
Did completing the checklist for your course result in multiple X’s? If so, we advise you to take action and adjust your assessment. At the moment, there is no ready-made solution. Therefore, it is advisable to combine strategies. Meanwhile, assessment forms can vary widely and are bound by disciplinary conventions. This means that some strategies may not be applicable to your situation.
Do you have questions based on the checklist results? We encourage you to contact TLC advisors, assessment experts or programme directors to seek advice and further guidance.
If you suspect a student made unauthorised use of GenAI in an assignment or examination, please inform the examination board. They can investigate the matter and take appropriate action. You can discuss your suspicions with the student, however suspicions in themselves do not serve as evidence in fraud cases.
The current detection tools are not reliable, since they cannot accurately predict whether a text is (partly) written by GenAI or by a human. Therefore, it is better not to use them.
Overall, non-supervised (written) assignments are prone to the misuse of GenAI. Click here for more information. Evaluate the learning objectives and consider whether other forms of assessment might be possible. Can the weight of written assignments be reduced in favour of other types of assessment? Click here for inspiration.
Below, find some suggestions on how to avoid unauthorised GenAI use in assessment:
When using unsupervised assignments, make sure that the final grade is also based on forms of assessment with supervision and without access to GenAI. This way, you make sure that students really achieved the learning outcomes.
When using unsupervised assignments, make sure the assignments are difficult to complete with the help of GenAI. For instance: ask students to integrate (personal) examples, case studies, theories or research that is course specific.
Help your students to understand plagiarism and fraud and to evaluate GenAI output. Discuss the implications of using GenAI in assignments and explain why it is valuable for your students to do their own research. In doing so, you could draw on their motivation. For instance: explain the value of the assignment you give them. What are the learning outcomes? How will this help your students in the long term? What are the benefits if your students do this without the help of GenAI?
Provide clear guidelines for the use of GenAI in your course or assignment. This way, your students will know whether and how they can responsibly use GenAI.
Via TLC Contact, you can contact your faculty’s assessment specialists. You can discuss potential changes to your assessment with them. Besides, it is possible to seek advice from the assessment specialists at TLC Central (tlc@uva.nl). Make sure to inform your programme director, so that they can make an overview of the situation and risks at programme level.

