28 March 2024, the very first FRIS Festival took place! FRIS stands for Fair, Resilient & Inclusive Societies. The Special Interest Group (SIG) FRIS works together on innovative education-questions, and, during the FRIS Festival, called on participants to explore together.
Watch the video impression and taste the atmosphere! Besides, you can find more about the inspiring speeches, interactive workshops and networking sessions below. Get inspired by the key insights that came along during the refreshing afternoon of inspiration.
The FRIS Festival 2024 was organized by the SIG FRIS, an initiative of TLC Central in collaboration with the Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies.
A stimulating agenda was compiled for the FRIS Festival to provide space for inspiring lectures, interactive workshops and nourishing moments of rest with interested educators, students, supporting staff and other stakeholders from inside and outside the UvA . Together, they explored innovative ideas and insights for their own educational practice, to contribute to understanding and addressing urgent issues in times of increasing inequality and major social, political and economic transitions.
Connecting half-hour breaks were scheduled between the various agenda items. A FRIS silence room was also set up, for self-reflection or to let things sink in. The festival afternoon ended with a plenary session on the theme Re-thinking education for a FRIS world by Machiel Keestra, Koen Wessels and Mieke Lopes Cardozo. The festival ended with drinks, where participants could connect.
FRIS coordinator Mieke Lopes Cardozo wants to inspire people to ‘refresh’ the overheated education system. “If we, as agents of change, want to have a meaningful impact on systemic change, we cannot do so without changing ourselves. This requires becoming aware of our views of the world, our paradigms, our ways of being, and our interaction with students and colleagues.” The approach in the FRIS community is inspired by regenerative theory and design methods. Therefore, during the FRIS Festival, we set out to work with a dynamic framework called 3 lines of work:
Upon entering, participants wrote their name on their nameplate and underneath it a word that motivates their education. Participants wrote words like “bad students”, “guerrilla gardening”, “connection”, “I love learning”, and “refresh”. In the welcome speech, time was taken for participants to reflect on what equity, resilience and inclusion mean to them. They were also asked to set an intention: What would make this afternoon a regenerative/revitalising break for you, why, and what would this ask of your way of being here?
The welcome speech by Mieke Lopes Cardozo was followed by plenary inspirational lectures by FRIS members Hülya Kosar-Altinyelken and Sanjay Bissessur on the question What social challenges drive your passion for teaching?
Speaker and FRIS grant holder Hülya Kosar Altinyelken reflected on inclusive education during the FRIS Festival with a particular focus on the relevance of shadow-work for promoting inclusion in higher education.
Hülya: “Inclusion is not only a societal challenge, it is also a challenge within our own psyche, and these two are intricately connected. We push the qualities that do not fit our Persona into our unconscious, to so-called Shadow. The deeper this division is and the more unconscious the Shadow is, the more we experience it as a stranger, an Other, or an alien invader. When we project our Shadow to individuals or groups, we reject them, we judge them, we find them alien, undesirable, and even threatening. Another problem with this division is that our actions in the outside world mirror our inner attitude. If we continuously reject and disown our own Shadow, we tend to behave in similar ways during our social interactions as well. Because we simply do not know how to deal with differences. Our identity and sense of self are even threatened by these so-called alien aspects, so we are tempted to exclude and reject them. Such mechanisms naturally hinder inclusion. Therefore, in order to promote inclusion in our society and within our educational spaces, engaging in shadow work is highly important.”
Speaker and FRIS grant holder Sanjay Bissessur posed the FRIS-relevant question: How do we create an environment that helps all students to have a positive learning experience? We don’t just want students to learn something, we want them to feel that they have had a positive experience and made meaningful connections with each other and the world around them. Education is not just about subject-matter knowledge, but should also make room for student well-being, so that they can develop themselves and their social and professional identity.
After the lectures, Mieke invited attendees to discuss with the participants next to them how the lectures inspired them. But also, what opportunities they see for their own role, what that requires of them and what support networks they can identify to collaborate with. From the audience came reflections on an academic challenge; that as a scientist, you may choose to work with the best 10% of students (motivated, goal-oriented students, often from more privileged backgrounds). But as an educator, on the other hand, you likely aim to enhance the development of all – including students from less privileged backgrounds. There is a tension there that you have to navigate as an educator, to provide both inclusive and inspiring teaching within a limited timeframe, and also live up to the high demands to publish research. This is why TLC started to offer teaching innovation scholarships like the FRIS grant, yet these only provide some space and time during a short period of time.
Other FRIS grant holders also had an active role in the festival. They gave interactive workshops on topics related to their own FRIS educational innovation projects, for example on ‘Diversity matters matter’ (by Ceren S. Abacioglu i.c.w. Sneha Gaddam and Chei Billedo), on ‘The Contact Zone: experimenting with film in transdisciplinary learning’ (by Blandine Joret) and on ‘Diversity in and around the UvA classroom – The Good, The Bad, and The … Best practices ‘ (by Irene van Driel and Sindy Sumter).
These workshops gave participants the space to experience and experiment with FRIS-relevant pedagogical innovations in order to gain ideas for their own teaching practice.
A workshop ‘Deep Democracy: shooting arrows and how to use polarisation’ was also conducted by Neeltje Schrofer. Deep Democracy is decision-making method with attention and appreciation for other viewpoint. Not by compromising, but having true consensus. Taking on conflict, resolving it and not walking around it. During this workshop participants did the exercise Shooting arrows’, which you can do when you are in conflict as a group. Then you shoot arrows’ at a polarised issue by stating your opinion, arguments, statements. 3 polarising statements were given from which the participants could choose 1 statement to work with. The chosen proposition was: Only educators from minority backgrounds can teach on topics about minorities, diversity and inclusion.
The instructions during the workshop were simple: say anything! You just ‘shoot’ your statement into the room; you can even shout. However, some feel that an agreement should reached on offensive language. Others disagree, feeling that this encourages self-censorship. It is important to note which arrows gave you an “ouch”. Which statement hurted? Take the wisdom back: allow yourself the grain of truth you see in the mirror. This is actually a recap of working on your on shadows and learning about yourself.
The conclusion of this session was that methods like deep democracy can help deal with complex and potentially polarising issues in our academic education.
“So much of what happens in academia is so framed. There is a need for more creative space”.
“Inclusiveness is the absence of exclusion”.
“Our university should be a more caring university, for everyone”
“Don’t fight it, dismantle collectively”
“We need some anger, everything here is so damn polite”
“How can we be more resilient? Because resilience means taking shit”
“We have a moral and ethical obligation to initiate discussions that are uncomfortable but not unsafe”
“Anger is a very important emotion of care and love”
“I try to encourage my students not to accept things as they are, but to stand up when they feel things should be different”