As teachers, we may feel that it is up to the students to make sure they are motivated to learn, and that their motivation is not our concern. True as this may be, most of us have also found that a group of motivated and interested students is much easier and more satisfying to work with, and can even save us time preparing for classes. Also, if we’re honest, we have to acknowledge that it is only human to be more interested in some topics than others – most of us have had to learn to motivate ourselves in various situations. If we can give our students a bit of a leg-up, this can make life easier and more enjoyable for all of us.
On this page, you will find an overview of different types of motivation. We also discuss the influence of interpersonal relationships, transparency and autonomy on motivation.
A third, less well-known, type of motivation is known as internalised motivation. It derives from Self-Determination Theory, which defines it as: “the process of taking in values, beliefs or behavioural regulations from external sources and transforming them into one’s own.”
Although Ryan and Deci (the founders of Self-Determination Theory) identify varying degrees of internalisation, they all rely on the need to feel related to other people, and the need to feel competent and be perceived as being competent by others.
Therefore, a student may become interested in a topic, when they see the interest and enthusiasm for that topic in someone they respect or someone they consider as part of their in-group.
It can be very motivating for students when a teacher explicitly explains how reading an article, completing an assignment or participating in a discussion adds to a student’s knowledge and skills, or relates to practical situations in a future workplace. People tend to want to engage in activities whose value and significance they understand. (Together with competence, this forms the basis of Expectancy-Value theory.)
It often benefits students’ motivation if the teacher is very clear about why something is expected of students, why the course has a certain structure, or why it is impossible for a teacher to provide extensive feedback on the work of 150 students within two days, etc. This gives students the feeling that they are taken seriously and respected as adults, while at the same time encouraging them to take responsibility for their own learning process.
We probably all have experienced the difference between being told exactly what to do and how to do it, versus being given a rough idea of the desired outcome and trusted with finding a way to achieve it ourselves. In the first situation, we are merely executing instructions. In the second, our knowledge, skills and creativity is appealed to. Most people find the second option infinitely more satisfying and motivating.
Even more so than relatedness and competence, our need for autonomy is central to Self-Determination Theory. And for good reason: when activities and tasks are perceived as voluntary or self-endorsed, people tend to be much more committed to them.
Therefore, giving students choices between or within assignments, emphasising aims rather than preconceived processes, and building in creative components helps to satisfy the need for autonomy, and with that, enhance a sense of achievement. It also trains transferability of knowledge and higher-level thinking skills.

